Apple studio max9/25/2023 In Blender, Final Cut Pro, 3DMark, and Rise of the Tomb Raider, the M2 Max consistently performed the same or better than the M1 Ultra. In Luke’s testing, the M2 Max performed very similarly or outperformed last year’s M1 Ultra. It’s important to note that some applications cannot take advantage of the M2 Ultra fully, and in non-optimized applications, you should not expect double the performance.ĭespite this incredible efficiency and performance, the better deal might be the M2 Max. With M2 Ultra, because of this new memory controller, Apple can now achieve the same incredible performance without the memory buffer needing to be maxed out. M1 Ultra was very good at doing many tasks simultaneously but struggled to do one task, such as benchmarking or rendering, faster than the M1 Max. The reason for the massive performance improvement is that Apple added a memory controller chip to the M2 generation that balances the load between all of M2 Ultra’s cores – M1 Ultra required the ram to be maxed out before using all cores. He also found that the M2 Ultra doubled the GPU performance of the M1 Ultra in these same benchmarks – a genuinely remarkable year-over-year upgrade. In Luke’s testing, he found that in some GPU heavy applications, like Blender 3D and 3DMark, the M2 Ultra was sometimes precisely twice the performance of M2 Max – perfect GPU scaling! In Final Cut Pro exports, it nearly doubled again. Despite the M1 Ultra literally being 2 M1 Max’s fused, the performance was never doubled.įor the M2 series, Apple has made some significant changes under the hood, especially in GPU scaling. In many tasks, the much cheaper M1 Max wasn’t too far off from the top-end M1 Ultra variant, especially in video editing, photo editing, and 3D rendering. While the M1 Max and M1 Ultra are blazing fast, the difference between the two wasn’t as notable as some expected. I'm comfortable with the conclusions I've drawn thus far - it remains the excellent system it was when it debuted last year - but if necessary may update with more about this particular configuration for creative work and gaming.While the new Mac Studio is just an under-the-hood spec bump, the M2 generation shows promising results in new benchmarks by YouTuber Luke Miani. Apple has made some key changes that show off the prowess and flexibility of Apple Silicon compared to Intel. I've only had a few days with the system, so I'm still sorting out the various performance nuances. For reference, the CPU performance seems about the same as an Intel Core i7-13700H. One interesting pattern that I see is that the more GPU cores there are the less you get out of each individual core within a given generation and about a 5% increase per core from M1 to M2.Īs we've seen with the M1 generation, multicore CPU performance is almost identical for a given core configuration - in other words, the 12-core M2 Pro's as fast as the 12-core M2 Max - and about 20% faster than the 10-core M1 Max. Using it, though, we can extrapolate that the M2 Ultra's 76-core version should provide a little less than twice that of the 38-core M2 Max and fall a little short of the RTX 4070 Ti. Read more: Apple MacBook Air 15-Inch Review: Finally, Big for Less For a frame of reference, the 38-core performance puts it roughly comparable to an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, at least in one cross-platform benchmark (3D Mark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited), but there are a variety of metrics that simply aren't reflected by that test. The 38-core GPU in the Studio's M2 Max delivers about 20% better Metal performance over the 32-core GPU in the M1 Max, almost entirely because of the increase in the number of cores.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |